A tale of mistaken identity and corrupted evidence
The story medical authorities tell about viruses are on the one hand errors of judgement and on the other a way of creating study objectives as well as study methods. I have been highlighting this situation for a long time based on scientific evidence that has repeatedly emerged and has been repeatedly confirmed over the past two hundred years. Scientists know that the micro-organisms found in infected tissue have emerged from that diseased tissue itself, not from the outside environment. They know that the presence of two things at the same time in the same place does not constitute a causal link between the two. Scientists have also demonstrated that viruses are not alive, are not organisms and do not attack. Viruses are a massive excuse to cover up poisoning. And yet, the public stays mute. They are forced from one panic mode into the next, and they oblige. The public - and you are part of the public - does not make an effort to acknowledge the truth. You all keep fighting medical authorities on issues they know they control, such as the content of vaccinations or the recorded effects of vaccinations. The question is not whether or not vaccinations are safe and effective. That question is obsolete when we implement scientific knowledge about infections, bacteria and viruses. When we take notice of the science that tells us that infections are not being passed on as a result of the jumping of a micro-organism from one individual to another then we do not need any 'protection' against such an imaginary attack. When we take notice that science has never isolated or identified a single virus then we realise they do not exist as micro-organisms.
There is a tsunami of so-called information, powered by a non-critical media, drowning us daily in a pool of selected lies. Does that same media machine, seeking the truth for our benefit, give you information about anything that opposes the authority's view on vaccinations and infections? Did you hear about the court case that concluded that there is no scientific evidence at all that viruses exist?
Pharmaceutical companies are being challenged, both scientifically and socially, but the media is not really interested in telling you about it. Merck faced two separate class action lawsuits because they lied about the effectiveness of the mumps vaccine in the MMR combination. It was shown they fabricated efficiency studies over the last two decades to maintain the illusion that the vaccine is very protective.
A study conducted by Gary S. Goldman and Neil Z. Miller was published in the Human and Experimental Toxicology Journal. They have been studying the dangers of vaccines for twenty five years and they found a direct statistical correlation between higher vaccine doses and infant mortality rates. ("Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?")
The US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) main goal is to protect public health and safety through the control and prevention of disease, injury, and disability in the US and internationally. Brian Hooker published a paper with a comprehensive analysis of the CDC's own data from 2003 revealing a 340% increased risk of autism in African-American children following the MMR vaccine (Translational Neurodegeneration Journal). Dr. William Thompson confirmed that the CDC knew about the relationship between the age of first MMR vaccine and autism incidence in African-American boys as early as 2003 but they chose to cover it up.
And what about the measles virus? German biologist Dr. Stefan Lanka initially offered 100,000 euro to anyone who could provide scientific evidence that the measles virus existed. In a long drawn out court battle (ending February 16, 2016) five experts have been involved in presenting the results of scientific studies. All five, including Prof. Dr. Dr. Andreas Podbielski, appointed by the preceding court, have consistently found that none of the six publications which were introduced to the trial contained scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus. The so-called genetic fingerprinting of the measles virus was independently examined by two recognised laboratories, including the world's largest and leading genetic institute. The results prove that the authors of the six publications were wrong and as a direct result all measles virologists are wrong. They have misinterpreted ordinary constituents of cells as part of the suspected measles virus. Because of this error they have been building normal cell particles into a model of a measles virus, which now identifies the virus as an illusion. With the results of the genetic tests, all thesis of the existence of the measles virus has been scientifically disproven. The virus is a fabrication, a model that has been created out of normal cellular pieces, and it didn't involve an invasion of foreign material.
The error was not realised by the authors and everybody else because they violated a fundamental scientific duty, and that is to carry out control experiments. Control experiments would have protected the authors and mankind from this momentous error, which became the basis of the belief in the existence of any disease-causing-viruses. It was decided not to do control experiments with these studies, sponsored by the industry, and I leave it up to you to guess the reason behind this decision.
The six publications submitted in the trial are the main relevant publications on the subject of measles virus. As a result of the Supreme Court Judgement any national and international statements on the alleged measles virus, the infectivity of measles, and on the benefit and safety of vaccination against measles are since then deprived of their legal basis.
Upon enquiries the head of the National Reference Institute for Measles at the Robert Koch Institute, Prof. Dr. Annette Mankertz admitted an important fact, namely that the measles virus does contain typical cell's natural components and that vaccination against measles therefore would cause frequent and severe allergies and autoimmune reactions.
Prof. Podbielski stated on several occasions that by the assertion of the Robert Koch Institute with regard to the natural cell components in the measles virus the thesis of existence of measles virus has been falsified. The conclusion cannot be anything else than that the measles virus does not exist. It is a fictional character in a story of fiction and make-belief.
The way the results of this pharmaceutical research is presented makes us believe researchers have identified and isolated the virus they talk about. The truth is that true isolation never happens, no isolation 'without a shadow of a doubt'. The whole HIV and AIDS debacle has made that quite clear, although, once again the media failed to inform us properly. We were told that researchers had isolated the HIV-virus and had proven this to be the cause of the AIDS syndrome. In reality there was a thunderous controversy about the scientific papers that had been published on this subject and the claims within them were seriously questioned within the scientific community. None of the objections were ever refuted and most of them were never even addressed. In an interview in 1997 Montagnier, one of the 'discoverers', admitted that he and his colleagues did not carry out purification of the cell particle. He conceded that only an "assemblage of properties" of the cell particle was detected by his team on the cell membrane and that no electronmicroscopic photographs were published to show this cell material. In fact, they refused to publish 'the evidence'. Nevertheless, non-identified proteins were used as substrate for the "HIV test" patented by Montagnier in 1983 with the claim that they were retrovirus proteins of the newly isolated HIV, while in fact they were only cell particles.
This brings into question the entire story of how the immune system works as certain important questions have never been answered.
- Why does the immune system, under certain conditions, attack the body's own proteins?
- Why are cancer cells not recognised by the immune cells as being foreign?
- During pregnancy, why don't the immune cells attack the embryo?
- Why are intestinal bacteria not regarded as foreign?
This touches on the fundamental dogma of immunology, namely the assumption that immune cells can recognise foreign proteins and molecules and can differentiate between the body's own 55,000 odd proteins and proteins and molecules from other organisms. It is this perception that largely contributes to the seemingly plausible theory that a sophisticated virus has infiltrated the body. The infection invasion theory is a fallacy. Testing for 'specific' antibodies in order to identify the attacker can only be done by manipulating scientific good practice guidelines.
It could have been a lot easier if notice was taken of all scientific publications, instead of selecting the ones the authority likes. In the mid seventies it was proven that nitrite poisoning caused a series of physical and mental effects that later were named the AIDS syndrome. The AIDS disease is caused by poisoning and the HIV virus does not exist. The horrific outbreak of mad cows disease in the early nineties was caused by poisoning which induces certain prions within the tissues, mainly the nervous tissue. Consequently, the human variant, Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease is also due to poisoning. In fact, going back in time through the history of viral diseases we continuously find reports proving poison to be the cause of the disease rather than the invisible elusive virus. And this goes all the way back to the beginning, all the way back to polio, which was proven, at that time, to be caused by poisoning through pesticides.
Scientists have given us real proof of disease causes, but the media does not give a voice to those researchers. If it disturbs the story put out by the medical authorities, which is the industry, then two campaigns are started. One campaign concentrates on bombarding the population with information, promises and fears that will keep them mesmerized, and the other is directed towards undermining the credibility of those researchers. When their work, their papers and their conclusions cannot be dismissed as bullshit the campaign becomes very personal. Any old dirt that can be misconstrued, taken out of context or time frame, will be spread in the media, who is more than willing to lend a helping hand to the hand that feeds them, the hand of the authority, of the industry.
The media, and that includes the social media, controls what we believe. Even facebook has decided what is fake news with regards to vaccinations, and removes it from the ether. It is no longer in people's view. It is no longer available as information to the people. That does not constitute freedom of speech, freedom of publication, freedom of thought. Authorities that give themselves the "right" to check your conversations and to withdraw them, to annihilate them, are violating the right to freedom of speech. Any government that allows this to happen to their citizens should not consider themselves protectors of freedom. As an authority and a government it would adorn them to make a public and open choice: either they are afraid and need restrictions and controls, or they propagate free speech. Please do not pretend to do both at the same time!
I am looking forward to the day the truth goes viral.